Those wacky LibertariansThis has to be one of the worst campaign decisions I have seen in a long time.
- This is a shared sign between two candidates
- Neither candidate will be listed as "Bob" on the Ballot
- People have no idea what office "Bob" is running for
- There appears to be no disclaimer on the sign
12 comments:
This can't be serious...
Didn't SYLVESTER!! just have a picture of Sylvester the cat on his campaign signs for school board?
It is quite literally the dumbest campaign sign I have ever seen. Marginally worse than the horrible "what about 5th Place Bob" signs that Kool Aid drinker Bob Morris used in the Spring
Kinda reminiscent of VOTE FOR PEDRO, don't you think?
acronym contest:
quick! what does B.O.B. stand for?
Bombs over Baghdad?
There is a disclaimer on the signs, you just can't see it because I took the pic with a camera phone.
People will know who Bob is because you just told them.
would have been more productive to put, "vote for libertarians", on a sign
What size font is the disclaimer? I can't believe you wasted money on these signs! It makes me think twice before voting for any Libertarian.
It's better to waste about $300 on signs than it is to waste $50 million on a redundant ballpark.
It won't be redundant for long
The next step down from this sign would be a Generic sign that simply says "Campaign Sign" in Black letters on white background. Similar to the generic food they use to have at Cub Foods.
Post a Comment