CFW, how about a blurb about the article in the paper from Sharon Kuhn? I'd love to see some unmoderated comments about that (AWB has it on his site, but you can guarantee that he won't post any negative comments about the letter.)
Hate to bother you and the Journal with FACTS but $46,000 minus the $16,000 loan paid off equals $30,000, not $62,000. The larger amount does make for a more impressive headline though - even if it's not true. No doubt the Journal will issue a correction on page 25D in a few days.
And one of the first rules of personal finance is that you can't borrow your way out of debt. Apparently those who aspire to spend our tax dollars don't get it.
8 comments:
I almost feel sorry for the fool.
Wht don't you change the name of this blog to something like the "We hate Matt Kelty blog". It's obvious that's your only agenda.
nate,
With AWB in operation, there needs to be some balance in the universe.
Great acting in this commercial The conversation sounds so natural.
CFW, how about a blurb about the article in the paper from Sharon Kuhn? I'd love to see some unmoderated comments about that (AWB has it on his site, but you can guarantee that he won't post any negative comments about the letter.)
Hate to bother you and the Journal with FACTS but $46,000 minus the $16,000 loan paid off equals $30,000, not $62,000. The larger amount does make for a more impressive headline though - even if it's not true. No doubt the Journal will issue a correction on page 25D in a few days.
The correction was published today.
And one of the first rules of personal finance is that you can't borrow your way out of debt. Apparently those who aspire to spend our tax dollars don't get it.
It just gets worse and worse. How will Mr. Kelty ever get out of debt? You reading this Fred?
Post a Comment